The development was largely attributed to what the World Economic
Forum’s (WEF) Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) 2014-2015, which was
made available exclusively to our source by WEF, described as the country’s
weakened public finances as a result of lower oil exports.
But commenting on the GCR, the Chief Executive Officer, National
Competitiveness Council of Nigeria (NCCN), A source who spoke to Nigeriaournation, faulted the rankings, pointing out that the report, which
referred to Nigeria as Africa’s largest economy, used the old GDP
figures in its calculations. This, according to him, worsened the
nation’s position.
Continuing, the GCR pointed out that institutions in Nigeria remained
weak with a ranking of 129 out of 144. Other factors that led to the
country’s drop in the GCR were insufficiently protected property rights,
high corruption, and undue influence.
In addition, it stated that the deterioration in national security in
Nigeria, which was also ranked 139 out of 144, remained dire.
“Nigeria must continue to upgrade its infrastructure (134th) as well as
improve its health and primary education (143rd). Furthermore, the
country is not harnessing the latest technologies for productivity
enhancements, as demonstrated by its low rates of ICT penetration,” it
stated.
However, on the upside, the report noted that Nigeria benefits from its
relatively large market size (33rd out of 144), which bears the
potential for significant economies of scale; a relatively efficient
labour market (40th out of 144) driven by its flexibility (20th out of
144).
Furthermore, the GCR also acknowledged the country’s solid financial
market (67th out of 144), following its gradual recovery from the 2009
crisis.
“However, poor availability and affordability of finance in general and the difficulties in obtaining loans in particular (137th) remain an important bottleneck to economic growth.
“Ahead of the 2015 election cycle, it will thus be critical to keep the ongoing reform momentum to diversify the economy and increase the country’s long-term competitiveness,” it added.
“However, poor availability and affordability of finance in general and the difficulties in obtaining loans in particular (137th) remain an important bottleneck to economic growth.
“Ahead of the 2015 election cycle, it will thus be critical to keep the ongoing reform momentum to diversify the economy and increase the country’s long-term competitiveness,” it added.
Overall, Switzerland emerged top on the ranking for the sixth
consecutive year, and was closely followed by Singapore, USA, Finland
and Germany in that order.
However, in Africa, Mauritius which was ranked 39th in the GCI
reaffirmed its position as the continent’s most competitive economy.
But South Africa, Africa’s second largest economy, also dropped to 56th
on the index. South Africa, according to the report, is now the third
most competitive BRICS economy after China (28th) and Russia (53rd).
African economies enjoyed mixed success in their attempts to become more competitive, according to the GCR.
African economies enjoyed mixed success in their attempts to become more competitive, according to the GCR.
Other countries ranked on the index were Lesotho (107th), Cape Verde
(114th), Botswana (74th), Namibia (88th), Zambia (96th), Ghana (111th),
Senegal (112th) and Swaziland (123rd).
Among the oil-exporting economies, Gabon was the highest-ranked economy
(106th) followed by Cameroun (116th), Nigeria, Angola (140th) and Chad
(143rd).
Among Africa’s low-income economies, the most improved was Ethiopia,
which recorded the biggest leap, rising nine places to 118th.
The report stated that despite years of bold monetary policy, global
economic growth remained at risk as several countries struggled to
implement growth-boosting structural reforms.
Commenting on Nigeria’s ranking, Mordi said the reasons adduced for the
deteriorating rankings were Boko Haram and weaker institutions, an
assertion he argued was “profoundly rebutted by our Ebola containment
relative to countries ranked at par or better than us”.
“Poorer public finance, again a jaundiced opinion, as our public
finances are stronger with lower deficit financing, fiscal restraint, a
stable currency and single digit inflation, in contrast with Ghana whose
currency is in free fall and debt has skyrocketed.
“Yet Ghana has an improved score on the same parameter; and weak health and primary education where we ranked the second worst in the world. Do you truly believe that?,” he asked.
“Yet Ghana has an improved score on the same parameter; and weak health and primary education where we ranked the second worst in the world. Do you truly believe that?,” he asked.
Although he acknowledged that a high GCI ranking was good to have, he said it remains an opinion.
Mordi insisted that the most important opinion was that of the investment community and the reality of the country’s position.
He explained: “In this year’s World Street Journal survey of
multinational CEOs, Nigeria ranked first as an emerging market
investment destination. Investors vote with their wallet and Nigeria’s
FDI remains the highest in Africa.
“Finally, the WEF GCI is a lagging indicator and does not reflect the
actions taken this year. We expect an improvement and better allignment
with reality in subsequent years as the NCCN, which came into full
operations nine months ago has taken fundamental steps and put building
blocks in place to improve our competitiveness.
“The most significant of these steps is a brain trust of 56 of the
brightest minds and practitioners in Nigeria. They commenced work in
April and include leading businessmen, CEOs of large corporates, CEOs
and partners of the top multinational consulting firms, leading
academics and regulators.”
The GCR’s rankings are based on the GCI, which was introduced by WEF in 2004.
Competitiveness includes the set of institutions, policies and factors
that determine the level of productivity of a country. GCI scores are
calculated by drawing together country-level data in 12 categories – the
“pillars of competitiveness” – to create a comprehensive picture of a
country’s economic performance.
The 12 pillars are: institutions; infrastructure; macroeconomic
environment; health; primary education, higher education and training;
goods market efficiency; labour market efficiency; financial market
development; technological readiness; market size; business
sophistication; and innovation.
No comments:
Post a Comment